![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
- tlv: !ic,
- tlv: abel,
- tlv: alexander hilbert,
- tlv: angeal hewley,
- tlv: avalon,
- tlv: christopher chaos,
- tlv: clement varker,
- tlv: dimitri alexander blaiddyd,
- tlv: doug eiffel,
- tlv: elim rawne,
- tlv: francesca "franky" cook,
- tlv: iris wildthyme,
- tlv: jacob seed,
- tlv: james "bucky" barnes,
- tlv: jedao two,
- tlv: jonathan reid,
- tlv: kirei kotomine,
- tlv: lark tennant,
- tlv: lestat de lioncourt,
- tlv: lester sheehan,
- tlv: mad sweeney,
- tlv: maggie garcia,
- tlv: malcolm bright,
- tlv: moon knight system,
- tlv: natalie scatorccio,
- tlv: neal caffrey,
- tlv: nita callahan,
- tlv: oscar,
- tlv: paul "jesus" rovia,
- tlv: raylan givens,
- tlv: reno,
- tlv: root,
- tlv: rosita espinosa,
- tlv: sam walls,
- tlv: steve rogers [captain america],
- tlv: trevor belmont,
- tlv: vincent smith,
- tlv: will graham,
- tlv: xie lian,
- tlv: zack fair
IC contact for ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
lastvoyages
[If I don't have an active post up, feel free to use this post to have your character call, videochat, text, or knock on Shaw's door.]
no subject
[This is more a muttered aside than anything; it's not really relevant to the topic at hand. She continues--]
He's the kinda guy who might be easily mistaken for a cult leader who goes by "the Father", I'm guessing?
no subject
no subject
If you end up thinking he did it on purpose - provoked Simon for fun, or spite, or something else - will you let me know?
no subject
[ He snorts at the very idea. He shakes his head. ]
If I had to guess, [ very much honesty, though he mostly sounds tired ] I would say that he had no idea that someone might react with such ferocity to him. And he believed his own actions to be entirely neutral.
[ A finger raised. ]
To be clear, I don't think them to be neutral. And I have no doubt Simon felt attacked by it all. [ The hand is turned. ] But I don't believe there was intent to provoke for any reason, other than a desire for interest and interaction. More talking, to be clear. Nothing like this.
no subject
You don't have to do the PR-speak; I'm not gonna bite your head off for using the word "neutral". Whatever he said or did probably was neutral.
no subject
The fact that I can phrase it without sounding like a jackass doesn't make it less honest. Specificity isn't an attempt to save your fragile feelings, I assure you.
no subject
no subject
[ The eyeroll is not abating. ]
Excellent. Anything else you need or want from my side of things?
no subject
But, uh-- no, just keep me up to date. Whoever's up to bat next, too; the pairings are about to swap over.
later
Re: later
no subject
no subject
No, I don't think he knew that at all, actually. His understanding of normal interaction... suffice to say it's non-existent.
And I doubt he 'broke in' so much as he probably appeared out of nowhere. He's a god, not a cat burglar.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yes [ He says it slowly. ] Which is why I am asking questions. What response were you expecting, exactly?
no subject
no subject
If you're going to read between the lines, do it properly.
no subject
'Your guy's breaking into rooms' is my specific issue. 'Take it seriously' is my specific request.
no subject
[ A hand raised. ]
Sider's personal boundary issues are something I take seriously. And have already taken steps to address and will continue to do so.
But considering that Simon is the one who killed someone in this instance, and that I found them in a hallway, nowhere near his room, giving no indication that there has been a repeat performance, I'm a little curious that this is the sticking point you have about the situation when Simon, again, violently murdered my inmate, something you've yet to indicate that you take seriously.
no subject
Simon's only my inmate for-- I'm guessing half a day, at most. If he tries to kill anyone else before then, he's gonna have to go through me, because he's not leaving my sight. After that, all I can do is write about this in his ledger - the ledger that plenty of wardens have told me they don't bother to read - and let his next temp know. Oh, and keep an eye on what he's doing when I see him in public, but even that gets me lectured sometimes.
But you're Sider's permanent warden, which means you've got more leverage and more resources, and where there's smoke, there's fire. "He's probably only done this crappy thing once, and someone else did something even worse" sucks as an argument. If you're dealing with his boundary issues, good, 'cause they need to be dealt with.
no subject
Right. Well, you've proven yourself delusional twice now and that's my limit. Thank you for the assurances that someone is looking out for Simon. Good day, Warden Shaw. And good luck with your surveillance.
no subject
no subject
Again, good day.
(no subject)
(no subject)