Entry tags:
- tlv: !ic,
- tlv: abel,
- tlv: alexander hilbert,
- tlv: angeal hewley,
- tlv: avalon,
- tlv: dimitri alexander blaiddyd,
- tlv: doug eiffel,
- tlv: elim rawne,
- tlv: francesca "franky" cook,
- tlv: iris wildthyme,
- tlv: jacob seed,
- tlv: james "bucky" barnes,
- tlv: jedao two,
- tlv: jonathan reid,
- tlv: kirei kotomine,
- tlv: lark tennant,
- tlv: lestat de lioncourt,
- tlv: lester sheehan,
- tlv: mad sweeney,
- tlv: maggie garcia,
- tlv: malcolm bright,
- tlv: natalie scatorccio,
- tlv: neal caffrey,
- tlv: nita callahan,
- tlv: oscar,
- tlv: paul "jesus" rovia,
- tlv: raylan givens,
- tlv: root,
- tlv: rosita espinosa,
- tlv: steve rogers [captain america],
- tlv: will graham,
- tlv: xie lian,
- tlv: zack fair
IC contact for
lastvoyages
[If I don't have an active post up, feel free to use this post to have your character call, videochat, text, or knock on Shaw's door.]
no subject
no subject
I'm not claiming that's fair, and I wouldn't suggest it to everyone. But I've gotten the impression you would rather focus on getting the work done instead of getting into unnecessary arguments. If we're speaking of nature, I think many tend to get defensive when they think they're being insulted. Even if that means taking a position they might not otherwise.
no subject
no subject
But, perhaps, if talking to someone else who doesn't think surveillance isn't the way to go, just stop at 'I think it's important to keep an eye on someone who's just murdered someone'. A simple statement of fact, and you can agree or disagree if someone else puts forth an idea about what to do instead. If they make any personal comment, it's on them.
If you comment on their character, then they can take it as an excuse not to listen.
no subject
no subject
no subject